(pressing HOME will start a new search)
|
|
TEACHING
CONSTRUCTION LABOR RELATIONS: THE LAW CONFRONTS NEW REALITIES
Steve
Goldblatt |
The
legal climate in which construction labor relations are conducted is
complex and ever-changing. Recent developments have emerged generally
in areas such as drug testing, polygraph testing, AIDS, sexual
harassment, immigration reform, parental leave, wrongful discharge,
employee privacy, mental stress claims, employee "right to
know," mandatory retirement's demise, and pensions and specifically
in areas such as prehire agreements, double-breasted operations,
Davis-Bacon reform, and criminal sanctions for safety violations. Teaching
a construction labor relations course in an undergraduate construction
program demands an understanding of relevant law, an interest in current
events, and access to a number of important periodicals. More so than any other course in our curricula, it demands the flexibility to immediately
integrate "new realities" into existing material, the
desire to do so, and the ability to explain to students these changes as
they are happening. Because
most undergraduates today entered high school since Ronald Reagan took
office, they seem less tolerant of uncertainty, less sensitive to
public policy issues, and more in need of definitive answers. This
course challenges all three attitudes! This
paper discusses my construction labor relations course at the University
of Washington. It provides a comprehensive course syllabus, schedule,
outline, and set of exams, as well as lists of useful books and
periodicals--just as my students receive. |
INTRODUCTION
Offered
annually since Winter 1983, the course is required for all Building Construction
juniors. It emphasizes the legal bases for construction labor relations. B CON
395 Construction Safety, B CON 460 Construction Communications, and B CON 490
Field Productivity are all electives available to our students in subsequent
quarters.
At
the final class meeting of my Autumn course with the juniors, I distribute the
bulletin below to get them ready for a full three hours the first night we
convene. They buy a complete course packet (three-hole punched for ease of use)
featuring overheads, exams, labor agreement, and more. All of my material comes
off of our department's Mac Plus and our college's laser printer--this means
superior clarity for the students and efficient updating each year for me.
Winter
1988
B CON 390U
CONSTRUCTION LABOR RELATIONS
W 6:30-9:20 PM
Gould
435
To
be prepared for the first class on Wednesday, January 6:
Purchase
a course packet from Kinko's at 4125 University Way. It will be available by
December 28, but you may want to call 632-0374 before you go. Look over the
material and pay special attention to the syllabus and schedule.
Purchase
the required course text, Smith's Construction
Labor Relations, from University Book Store. If you like, purchase the
recommended text, CCH's 1987 Guidebook to
Labor Relations. Both are available now. Read the pages noted below prior to
class.
You
will each receive a ten-week subscription to BNA's Construction
Labor Report. Regularly offered for nearly $600 per year, your cost will be
50 cents per issue. Please bring a $5 check, payable to Steve Goldblatt, to the
first class and I will pay BNA's invoice for $300 with one personal check.
When
we meet, we will discuss administrative details and review the course packet.
Then we will discuss hiring, union security, and prehire agreements--read Smith
ch 2 and ch 1, pages 44-51, and Guide sec 802, 308, 818-818.8. Then we will
discuss discharge, discipline, and supervision--read Smith ch 4 and Guide sec
808, 809, 811, 216, 602.
I
know that you will enjoy the course. See you in January!
B CON 390U W'88
SYLLABUS
TEXT:
Smith,
Construction Labor Relations (Commerce Clearing House, 1984) is
required. 1987 Guidebook to Labor
Relations (Commerce Clearing House, 1987) is recommended. A ten-week
subscription to the Construction Labor
Report (Bureau of National Affairs), at a very modest student rate, is
required.
COURSE
DESCRIPTION: An
introduction to construction labor topics, including labor-management
organization, legislation, and regulation, collective bargaining, and job site
administration.
PURPOSE:
Every
firm in the construction industry, whether unionized or not, deals with
employees on a daily basis. They must conduct their business according to
numerous rules established over the last fifty years. The purpose of this course
is to provide you with enough background in the particulars of construction
labor relations to avoid problems on the job.
MAJOR
OBJECTIVES: As
a result of satisfactorily completing this course, you will be able to
understand the organization of American labor-management relations; recognize
key pieces of labor legislation and regulation and identify the primary purpose,
issues, and impact of each; analyze labor contract terms, especially those
dealing with wages, hours, and fringe benefits; recognize and distinguish
certain procedures used in the processes of collective bargaining; and compare
and contrast labor relations in union and open shop construction.
READING:
Assigned
reading is to be done prior to class discussion as listed in the schedule.
Supplemental material will be put on two-hour reserve in the college library
each week.
EXAMS
AND REPORT: Three
essay exams and a short report are required as listed in the schedule.
EVALUATION:
Scores
will be earned on the three exams (weighted 25%, 35%, and 30%) and the report
(10%). Grades will be based on total weighted T scores.
CLASS SCHEDULE AND STRUCTURE
I
have scheduled this ten-week quarter's course to meet one night each week for
three fifty-minute hours, separated by two tenminute breaks. This permits an
uninterrupted discussion of the subject matter in a format I became familiar
with in law school.
The,
sixty-student class is divided into twelve five-person teams, six labeled
"management" and six "union" for the collective bargaining
exercise described below. Sitting together in class with their teammates,
students get about one opportunity per hour to discuss a sample fact pattern in
their small groups. I usually ask only open-ended questions to encourage student
participation in front of the entire class and to lessen the anxiety of those
who are not fully prepared.
In
a semester system, the course can be expanded to include such things as
labor-management history, labor economics, increased depth, and more guest
speakers.
B CON 390U W'88
SCHEDULE
First
January 6 Administration, overview: course
packet; hiring, union security, prehire agreements: Smith ch 2, 1:44-51, Guide sec 802, 308, 818-818.8; discharge,
discipline, supervision: Smith ch 4, Guide
sec 808, 809, 811, 216, 602.
Second
January 13 Strikes, striker rights,
lockouts: Smith ch 1:28-30, 8, Guide sec
1100-1102, 212, 613, 803-806, 810, 822-824, 813; picketing, related
activity: Guide sec 1103-1109; remedies
for unlawful strikes, picketing: Guide sec
1112-1115.
Third
January 20 First exam (25%);
collective bargaining obligations, subjects: Smith
ch 1:8-28,1:33-39, Guide sec 304, ch 12; bottom-up organizing: Guide
ch 4.
Fourth
January 27 Review exam; collective
bargaining structure: Smith ch 1:1-8, 1:30-33, 1:39-44; union hierarchy, local structure: packet;
negotiating concepts, preparation: packet.
Fifth
February 3 Unfair labor practices: Guide
ch 5 (see as needed ch 6-10); bargaining game outcomes: bargaining game
report due (10%).
Sixth
February 10 Restrictive agreements: Smith
ch 9; grievances, arbitration: packet;
employee benefit plans: packet.
Seventh
February 17 Second exam (35%); open,
dual shop: Smith ch 3.
Eighth
February 24 Review exam; employment
discrimination, affirmative action: Smith
ch 6.
Ninth
March 2 Wage and hour laws, prevailing
wage laws: Smith ch 5; health and
safety: Smith ch 7.
Tenth
March 9 Third exam (30%); student evaluation.
TEXTBOOK SELECTION AND RESERVE
Textbook
selection is relatively easy right now; there is only one book that is
reasonably up to date--CCH's Construction
Labor Relations by Arthur Smith--and it was written in 1984! Students find
it harder to read than McGraw-Hill's Labor
Law in Contractor's Language by McNeill Stokes, but the latter was written
in 1980 and is dated. CCH's Guidebook to
Fair Employment Practices and Guidebook
to Labor Relations are revised every two or three years and should be put on
two-hour reserve.
B
CON 390U W'88
BOOKS
ON RESERVE
|
PERIODICALS: CURRENT EVENTS
Current
events are the lifeblood of the course. I subscribe to or receive a number of
daily, weekly, and monthly publications that are crucial to staying up to date.
It can be a daunting, year-round task--I enjoy it. Three particular periodicals
together are sufficient to provide excellent coverage: BNA's Construction
Labor Report (weekly), ENR (weekly),
and The Wall Street Journal (weekdays).
The Journal allows instantaneous
discussion of an event, whereas CLR
and ENR give greater breadth and depth to issues in our industry two
weeks after an event occurs.
Because
so few students regularly read their local daily newspapers, these too should
be studied for regional events, regional slant on national events, and state
legislative matters.
Timely
articles can be copied and put on two-hour reserve in the library. More
importantly, they can be copied onto overhead transparencies for a powerful
visual aid to classroom discussion.
B CON 390U W'88
SELECTED PERIODICALS
ABA
Journal
American
Bar Association (Chicago) monthly
Builder
& Contractor
Associated
Builders and Contractors (Washington DC) monthly
Congressional
Quarterly Weekly Report Congressional
Quarterly (Washington DC) weekly
Construction
Labor Report
Bureau
of National Affairs (Washington DC) weekly
Constructor
Associated
General Contractors (Washington DC) monthly
ENR
(formerly
Engineering News-Record)
McGraw-Hill
(New York City) weekly
Investor's
Daily weekdays
Legislative
Digest & History of Bills Supplement Washington State Legislature (Olympia)
daily during session
Legislative
Meeting Schedule & Bill Status
Washington
State Legislature (Olympia) daily during session
National
Journal
National
Journal (Washington DC) weekly
Puget
Sound Business Journal
American
City Business Journals (Kansas City) weekly
Seattle
Daily Journal of Commerce daily except Sunday
Seattle
Post-Intelligencer daily
The
New York Times daily
The
Seattle Times daily
The
Wall Street Journal weekdays
COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING EXERCISE
Despite
the common understanding that only one-third of all construction (by dollar
volume) is performed by union labor, I am convinced that a collective bargaining
exercise is valuable for a number of reasons. The agreement we use is an actual,
current Seattle-area contract loaded with the complexities and trade-offs of
many years' bargaining. It not only teaches students about terms and conditions
of employment, wages and fringe benefits, and craft jurisdictional scope, it
reflects our recent local economic climate. Students also learn about teamwork
and negotiating, as well as the nature of multiemployer associations such as AGC.
B
CON 390U W'88
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING EXERCISE
Each
team member should study the June 1987 contract which begins in three pages.
Each team should begin meeting immediately to review the plumbers and
pipefitters' agreement with MCAW W in preparation for upcoming negotiations.
From
your viewpoint (management or labor), select five
clauses in the agreement that you would like to see changed. For each
of the five clauses, draft a proposal and
develop target and resistance
points. A proposal is what you are going to ask for. A
target point is what you hope to get. A
resistance point is the limit to which you will go.
For
each work classification, draft a
proposal and develop target and resistance points on wages and fringe benefits
effective 6/1/89 and 6/1/90. You can assume that the new contract period will
run two years from 6/1/89.
Prior
to negotiations, but no later than January 29, each team leader is to submit to the
instructor its proposals and target and resistance points for the clauses,
wages, and fringe benefits. Teams are to exchange proposals only with their counterparts (Management 1 with Union 1,
Management 2 with Union 2, ...).
Then
conduct two full-team bargaining
sessions with "the other side". Limit the first meeting to
negotiations over proposed clause changes or the monetary package. Use the second meeting for the remaining
negotiations. Reduce all agreements to writing as they occur--memories do fade!
No credit will be given to teams failing to reach agreement.
On
February 3, the two team leaders from each "game" together will submit
to the instructor one signed memorandum of agreement indicating terms of the new
contract. At that class meeting, the leaders will discuss the results of their
games with the entire class and our guest Jim Donaldson, MCAWW negotiator.
Two
weeks later, February 17, all class members will be asked on the second exam
about their particular team's and
game's negotiations.
COURSE OUTLINE
My
overhead transparencies, reproduced in the course packet, comprise the course
outline and serve many functions. They direct the students' reading prior to
each class session, lessen the burden of note-taking to make learning easier,
and focus the students' exam preparation.
B CON 390U
Class 1 OH 1 HIRING
Immigration
Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA) Recent developments
Drug
testing, negligent hiring, polygraph testing & HR 1212 Hiring hall
Source
of skilled workers
Exclusive
v. non-exclusive
Priority
for former employees: travelers? Minimum qualifications
UNION
SECURITY
Compulsory
unionism Closed shop Union shop Agency shop
Right-to-work
laws
PREHIRE AGREEMENTS
"Top
down" organizing
Unique
to construction
Voidable
until Deklewa: now enforceable for its
duration
At
expiration, no contin presump of
union's majority status Area agreements
Union
security provisions
Elections
Representation
Deauthorization
Unlawful
picketing
B CON 39OU Class 1 OH 2
DISCHARGE
AND DISCIPLINE
Employee
rights
Self-organize
Form,
join, assist unions Bargain collectively Concerted activity Refrain from above
Discharge
factors
Legitimate
business reason: AIDS? Company rules' violation Inability to perform work Drug
abuse and testing
Recent
developments
Smoking,
stress, wrongful discharge, references
SUPERVISION
Defined
by NLRA Contractor's rights Sources and ratios Conflicting loyalties Union
relationships Limited rewards Management communications Adequate training?
Casual employment Union discipline
B CON 390U Class 2 OH 1
STRIKES, STRIKER RIGHTS, LOCKOUTS
The
right to strike LMRA provisions
Economic
v. ULP strikes
Basic
NLRB definitions Recall v. reinstatement rights Conversion to ULP strike
Loss
of recall or reinstatement rights Permanent employment elsewhere Employer ceases
operations Strike misconduct
Discrimination
against strikers Super seniority for replacements
No
right to pay while on strike
Back
pay for discharged strikers
Strike
settlement agreements Recall rights
B
CON 390U Class 2 OH 2
more
STRIKES, STRIKER RIGHTS, LOCKOUTS
Sympathy
strikers
Protected
status Concerted activity
Refusal
to handle struck work
Contractual
restrictions on right to strike Scope of obligation Boys' Market injunction: criteria
Implied
clause enforcement: Gateway Coal
Exceptions
to no- strike clauses Sympathy strikes: Buffalo
Forge ULP strikes
Safety
dispute strikes
Lockouts
Offensive
v. defensive
Replacement
of locked-out employees
Washington
in 1987: Lockheed and C 2 L 87
until
12/27/87
B
CON 390U
Class 2 OH 3
PICKETING AND RELATED ACTIVITY
Introduction
Primary/secondary distinction
Traditional
primary picketing
Primary
object/secondary effect Common-situs picketing: Denver Building Trades
Reserved
gate doctrine: Moore Dry Dock criteria
Sign
language
Secondary
employer at primary sites: General
Electric criteria Handbilling: DeBartolo
revisited "Area standards" picketing
Jurisdictional
disputes: JA Jones criteria
Organizational and recognitional picketing Picketing over a prehire agreement
after Deklewa
B CON 39OU Class 2 OH 4
REMEDIES FOR UNLAWFUL STRIKES AND PICKETING
Damage
suits for unlawful strikes Monetary damages (LMRA 303) Compensatory v. punitive
damages Recover from union
Private
injunction suits for strikes over arbitrable issues Background/history
Contractor
must allege:
Mandatory
arbitration procedure No-strike clause or obligation Strike subject to procedure
Breaches
occurring or threatened Irreparable injury
Balanced
equities favor contractor ULP complaints
NLRB
procedures: charge, withdrawal, priorities, settlement, hearing, order, review,
compliance, enforcement
NLRB
injunctions
Responding
to violence, mass picketing, trespassing Altemose
Construction: settlement after 15 years
B
CON 390U Class 3 OH 1
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING OBLIGATIONS
Introduction
Multiemployer
bargaining
Union
consent
Contractor
withdrawal Unequivocal notice Timely
Unusual
circumstances
Picketing
"Bottom-up" organizing Good-faith bargaining
NLRA
section 8(d)
Strong
policy
Refusal
(ULP) seen in conduct Reasonable times and places Agreement not required
Subjects
B CON 390U Class 3 OH 2
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING SUBJECTS
Mandatory
subjects
Wages
and compensation Fringe benefits Work hours, loads, rules Safety practices
Grievance procedures Meals, discounts, services Subcontracting Union security
clauses No-strike clauses Drug testing
Permissive
subjects Bargaining unit scope Multiemployer bargaining Supervisor contract
terms Negotiators' designation Agreement ratification IAF, PAC contributions
Litigation settlement Business termination
Illegal
subjects
Closed
shop
Certain
"hot cargo" agreements
B CON 390U Class 3 OH 3
"BOTTOM-UP" ORGANIZING
Employment
factors
Wages
and fringe benefits Supervision
Grievance
procedure Personal treatment
Union
objective
Union
campaign
Field
representative Employees' role Authorization cards
Over
50% authorization
Over
30% authorization
Employer
"good faith doubt"
Representation
election
NLRB
role
Election
petition: 30% determination Representation hearing: appropriate unit Timing: too
early? too late? Contract bar
Election:
tally and objections
NLRB
certification If employer wins If union wins
Employer
obligation
Area
agreement
Impasse
B CON 390U Class 4 OH 1
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING STRUCTURE
Definitions
Informal
v. formal structure Election v. bargaining unit
Determinants
Region
Branch
of industry
Single
trade negotiations Advantages
Informal
comparisons ' Two-part decision Disadvantages
National
agreements
Parties
Terms Problems
National
Construction Stabilization Agreement of 1987
Project
agreements
Ohbayashi
for Toyota in Kentucky: yes! BE&K for USX-POSCO in California: no!
B
CON 390U
Class 4 OH 2
UNION HIERARCHY
Convention
Functions
Election
methods: delegates or referendum Elected officers:
General president
Secretary-treasurer
Executive
board
Appointed
officials: Professional staff
International
representative
Intermediate
level: District council
Joint
board
Local
Elected
officials: President
Business
agent Vice presidents
Recording
and financial secretaries Sergeant at arms
Committees:
Executive Negotiating Grievance
Steward
Professional
staff
Jurisdiction
Politics
Minority
control Small attendance Elections
Recent
developments
Teamsters,
Manhattan carpenters, Ohio carpenters, Philadelphia roofers
B
CON 390U Class 4 OH 3
UNION FINANCES
Significance
Costly activities Local autonomy Fluctuations
Sources
Dues
Fees
Special
assessments Investment income
Recent
developments
Variations
Craft
unions Industrial unions
B CON 390U Class 4 OH 4
CONTRACT
NEGOTIATION CONCEPTS
Collective bargaining Definition
Result
Characterizations
Armed
truce: power relationship
Working
harmony: power and rationality
Management/labor
coop: rationality and problem solving
Issue
types
Distributive
Integrative
Indirect
factors
Attitudinal
structuring Intra-organizational bargaining Target and resistance points
Planning
strategy
Priorities
Arguments
for proposed alternatives Presentation approach
B CON 390U Class 4 OH 5
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING PREPARATIONS
Management
objectives
Maintain
competitive labor costs Pursue chosen labor policy
Management
team
Contractor
representatives Specialists
Management
preparation Identify problem areas Gather supporting data Develop bargaining
book Plan negotiating course
Labor
objectives
Maintain
competitive labor costs Preserve jurisdictional work rules
Labor
team
Negotiating
committee representatives Specialists
Labor
preparation
Mass
meeting Wish list
"Winnowing
down" the list Separate demands
B
CON 390U Class 5 OH 1
UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES BY EMPLOYERS
Interference
with employee rights
Employer
responsibility
Free
speech v. interference
Threat
v. prophecy
Employee
rights v. property rights
Interference
with labor unions
Discrimination
against employees
Dis/encourage
union membership
Who
filed charges with NLRB
Refusal
to bargain Mandatory subjects
Good-faith
obligation
Extent
of duty Surface bargaining
Certain
"hot cargo" agreements
B CON 390U Class 5 OH 2
UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES BY UNIONS
Introduction
Background/history
Employer
responsibility and free speech Restraint or coercion of employees Causing
employers to discriminate Refusal to bargain
Prohibited
strikes and boycotts
Secondary
boycott
Common-situs
picketing
Reserved-gate
picketing
Jurisdictional
strike Excessive initiation fees Featherbedding Prohibited picketing
Organizational
Recognitional
Dual-purpose:
informational? Certain "hot cargo" agreements
B CON 39OU Class 6 OH 1
RESTRICTIVE AGREEMENTS
LMRA
section 8(e) prohibition
Primary
v. secondary effects "Employer in the construction industry"
"Entering into" an agreement Work "at the site"
Total
ban on subcontracting Union signatory clauses
Connell
and Woelke & Romero
"Wall
to wall" clauses
Owner
and CM clauses Union standards clauses
Fringe
benefit delinquency clauses Work preservation clauses Union label clauses
Anti-double-breasting
clauses Restrictions on truck owner-operators Picket line clauses
Enforcement
provisions Summary
Antitrust
law effects
Subcontracting
restrictions Multiemployer bargaining
"They
too" and "me too" clauses Industry fund clauses
Owner
involvement in negotiations
B
CON 390U
Class 6 OH 2
GRIEVANCES
Grievance
= alleged violation of worker rights
Violation
of collective bargaining agreement
Violation
of federal or state law
Violation
of past practice Violation of company rules
Violation
of management responsibilities
High
grievance rate factors
Unfavorable
task environment
Aggressive
union leadership I
neffective
managerial decision-making
Types
of grievances
Employee
Union
Class
action
Types
of grievants
Nongrievants
One-
or two-time grievants
Repeated
grievants
Grievants
responding to company disciplinary action
Management
philosophy Hard-line
Cost-effective
Permissive
B CON 390U Class 6 OH 3
GRIEVANCES AND ARBITRATION
Grievance
procedure
Entry:
who/what/where
Range
of disputes: rights, not interests
Process: steps
Default:
statute of limitations
Arbitration
Last
resort
Selection:
AAA, FMCS Arbitrator(s) role
Quasi-legal:
due process, evidence, precedence Decision: binding, enforceable
Appeals:
process, authority, arbitrariness
Misco:
boost for finality
No-strike
pledge
Exchanged
for grievance procedure Boys' Market: restraining
order Buffalo Forge: arbitrable
grievance Wildcat strike
B
CON 390U
Class 6 OH 4
EMPLOYEE
BENEFIT PLANS
Mandatory
subject of bargaining
LMRA
302(a) Illegal to influence with money
(b)
Illegal to accept money
(c)
Exempts employee benefit plans
Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) Problems with growth of private
pensions
Covered
plans: defined-contrib plans, defined-benefit plans,
employee
welfare benefit plans, IRAs Employee eligibility and participation Employer
contributions until age 70 Vesting = legally enforceable claim to benefits
Employee
contributions fully and immediately
Employer
contributions usually phased over time
Full
vesting at retirement
Fiduciary
responsibilities and liabilities: "social" investing
Insurance
and bonding
Reporting
and disclosure Funding of benefits by employers Limitations on contributions and
benefits
Set
by Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA) Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act (1980)
Plan
termination and plan termination insurance
Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corp (PBGC)
Defined-benefit
plans covered
Multiemployer
plan member withdrawal liability
Many
underfunded plans` shrinking bases?
Recent
developments: Federal FY88 budget (HJRes
395), minimum health insurance coverage under S 1265, unpaid parental leave under HR 925 and S 249, pension portability under Chandler and McCain
bills, Consolidated Omnibus Reconciliation Act of 1985 (COBRA)
B
CON 390U
Class 7 OH 1
OPEN AND DUAL SHOP
Growth
and nature of open shop
ABC:
"merit shop"
Advantages
of dual shop Disadvantages of dual shop
Prevailing
wage law and ERISA impediments Evaluating "double-breasted" operations
"Separate
employer" concept
Common
management
Common
control of personnel and labor relations
Interrelation
of operations
Common
ownership and financial control
Bargaining
unit criteria
"Alter
ego" principles
Practical
considerations Organization models Bankruptcy and open shop Union strategies
Legislative
reform
HR
281 and S 492 Legal actions Subcontracting clauses Market recovery programs
Organizing
Contractor
strategies
B
CON 39OU Class
8 OH 1
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
The
process of discrimination
Individual
Organizational
Structural
Civil
rights laws
Acknowledge
and combat discrimination Administered and enforced by the EEOC
Title
VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended Prohibited discrimination
HR
3071 and S 1575: AIDS
Sexual
harassment: Mentor Savings Bank Spoken
accent
Covered
employers
Equitable
relief
Two
theories of discrimination
Disparate
treatment = intentional discrimination Private, non-class action, discrimination
suit
Prima
facie case
Employer
defense
Pretext
evidence
Disparate
impact = discriminatory result Disproportionate adverse effect "Facially
neutral" treatment "Pattern or practice" consequence Evidence of
effect on protected class Use of statistics
B
CON 390U Class 8 OH 2
more
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
Age
Discrim in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) as amended
Prohibited
discrimination
No
mandatory retirement since 1/1/87
Covered
employers Exceptions
Executives
or policymakers
Apprenticeship
Equal
Pay Act of 1963 amended FLSA
Prohibited
discrimination Covered employers Equal work standards
Defenses:
seniority, merit, production, other non-sex factor
Comparable
worth Pre-employment inquiries Recent developments
B
CON 390U Class 8 OH 3
AFFIRMATIVE ACTION
Goals,
not quotas: good-faith effort
Voluntary programs permitted in Johnson
Executive
Order 11246 (1967) as amended
Rehabilitation
Act of 1973: AIDS after Arline Vietnam
Era Veterans Readjustment Act of 1974
Office
of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) Affirmative action plan:
1.
Ensure harassment-free working environment
2.
Develop minority and female recruitment sources
3.
Maintain minority and female applicants and referrals
4.
Notify director of union non-referrals
5.
Develop training opportunities
6.
Review EEO policy internally
7.
Disseminate EEO policy internally
8.
Disseminate EEO policy externally
9.
Direct recruitment to minority and female organizations
10.
Encourage minority and female employees to recruit
11.
Conduct annual inventory and evalution
12.
Ensure non-discrimination personnel practices
13.
Ensure non-segregated facilities and activities
14.
Document M/WBE subcontractor solicitations
15.
Review supervisors' performance annually
16.
Validate selection test procedures Compliance and enforcement: OFCCP under
attack Hometown plans retained but governed Minority/women business enterprises
(M/WBE)
Washington:
C 328 L 87 set up statewide cert as of 1/1/88
Richmond
VA, San Francisco Recent developments
B
CON 390U
Class 9 OH 1
WAGE AND HOUR LAWS
Fair
Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA) as amended Construction employers covered
since 1967 Employee or independent contractor?
Exempt
employees: executives, administrators, professionals Compensable working time
Minimum
wages
Overtime
pay after 40 hours/week Child labor
Recordkeeping
requirements Enforcement remedies Recent developments
Bills
to raise minimum wage: fed (S 837), Calif,
Wash
Contract
Work Hours and Safety Stds Act of 1962 as amended Federal contractors covered
Overtime pay after 40 hours/week since 1/1/86
Promotes
use of "flextime"
Overtime
itself may not be required
B
CON 39OU
Class 9 OH 2
PREVAILING WAGE LAWS
Davis-Bacon
Act (1931) as amended
Law
History
Prevailing
wages and fringe benefits Peak payroll period Similar construction Project
vicinity
Time
period Recordkeeping Rate request Compliance problems Labor defense Contractor
violations
Helpers:
DOL proposed rule changes 8/13/87 Recent developments
HR
2216 and companions, truck
drivers?, Navy lease
State
statutes
Washington:
renewed administrative commitment since 1986
C
321 L 87: facilities leased
at least 80% by the state
included
since 7/26/87 Recent developments: Massachusetts, Oregon
B CON 390U Class 9 OH 3
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY
B
CON 395: Spring
quarter elective
Occupational
Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSHA) Definition of "construction"
Inspections:
complaint, probable cause, or routine Compliance officer's visit to the jobsite
When
OSHA inspector arrives
Opening
conference
"Walkaround"
inspection
Closing
conference
Enforcement
by compliance officer
"General
duty" clause
Safety
and health standards
Regulations
Types
of violations: de minimis, non-serious, serious, repeated,
willful,
failure to abate, imminent danger
Penalties
for violations: record construction fines in 1987 Contractor responsibility:
multiemployer jobsite Options available upon receipt of citation
Contractor
defenses
How
to request a variance
Recordkeeping
requirements
Recent
developments: right to know, hazard communications, asbestos, benzene,
formaldehyde, respiratory protection, toxic exposure, excavation and trenching,
safety programs, criminal charges and HR
2664, plumbers and AIDS, separate OSHA for construction, CalOSHA, L'Ambiance
Plaza, TARP
In
honor of Lydig Construction's Wally Sharpe
saving lives at Husky Stadium 2/25/87.
In
memory of
Barry Keegan '83
(1952-1983).
EXAMS
Unlike
any of our other courses, my course's
three exams are exclusively essay-type. Although these are very difficult to write
and very time-consuming to grade, they test the students at the upper end of
Bloom's Taxonomy of Leaning--analysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Typical
multiple-choice and short-answer formats test at the lower half of the
taxonomy--knowledge, comprehension, and application.
The
course packet contains the previous four years' versions of all three tests, so
that students may practice answering actual exam questions. Graded exams are
returned at the next class and reviewed in depth. Students with the best answer
on each question are asked to recite their responses. Combined with my
explanation of what I am looking for in a "perfect" answer, the class
then understands both the material and their individual grades. With three
90-minute exams in ten weeks, no final exam is necessary.
B
CON 390U First Exam Winter
1987
QUESTION
1 (15 points): NAIL Construction threatened some of its employees with discharge
if they failed to join Carpenters Local 111, which NAIL favored, and NAIL
solicited. other employees to join 111. NAIL then entered into a labor
agreement, containing a union security provision, with 111. Has NAIL acted
lawfully? What recourse do the employees have, if any? Discuss.
QUESTION
2 (20 points): WHITE, a subcontractor, installed an electric welding machine and
assigned the job of pushing the buttons to operate the machine to members of the
Ironworkers. The members of Operating Engineers Local 222 struck after BLACK,
the general contractor, refused to sign a contract binding on itself and all its
subcontractors which would give 222 the job of operating all equipment on the
jobsite. Has 222 acted lawfully? What recourse does BLACK have against 222, if
any? Discuss.
QUESTION
3 (20 points): Laborers Local 333 picketed a jobsite of ACME Construction, with
signs protesting ACME's failure to meet the area wage and benefits standards.
333 never requested that ACME sign a contract with 333 and stated that the
picketing would cease if ACME complied with the area standards. 333 knew that
the picketing had effectively halted deliveries to ACME at the jobsite. Is 333's
picketing protected? Would your response differ if 333 was handbilling instead
of picketing? Would your response differ if the picketing continued after 333
had lost a representation election on the project? Discuss.
QUESTION
4 (20 points): Three employees of BEAR Construction refused to cross a primary
picket line established by the Ironworkers at BEAR's jobsite. BEAR discharged
the three employees--a carpenter, a laborer, and an operating engineer--by
relying on a no-strike clause in each of their local's agreements with BEAR. Has
BEAR acted lawfully? What recourse do the discharged employees have, if any?
Discuss.
QUESTION
5 (25 points): ZERO Construction, the general contractor on a project to build a
school, employed members of the Bricklayers, Laborers, and Operating Engineers.
PRIME, the mechanical subcontractor, employed members of the Plumbers. EDGE, the
electrical subcontractor, employed members of the Merit Labor Association which,
unlike the other unions, was not affiliated with the AFL-CIO. Local 555 of the
Electrical Workers picketed EDGE at the jobsite and employees of ZERO and PRIME
refused to cross 555's picket line. Is the picketing protected? Are the
employees of ZERO and PRIME protected? What steps should ZERO take at the
jobsite in its own interest? Discuss.
B CON 390U
Second
Exam Winter 1987
QUESTION
1 (15 points): What is your team ID? What did you agree upon as changes to wages
and benefits in your new contract? Which team(s) proposed changes to the
following two contract sections from your game and what agreement was reached on
them? Game 1: overtime, shift work; Game 2: protection of rights, apprentice
progression; Game 3: recognition, pre-employment processing; Game 4: grievance
procedures, protection of rights; Game 5: apprentice progression, preemployment
processing; Game 6: shift work, pre-employment processing.
QUESTION
2 (20 points): MERCER Construction contracts with a non-union supplier to
deliver ready-mixed concrete to a site where MERCER is engaged in the
construction of an interstate highway. Teamsters Local 222 has a contract with
MERCER which limits the subcontracting of on-site construction work to companies
whose employees are covered by an appropriate union contract. 222 seeks to
enforce this clause by interfering with deliveries of the concrete to the
jobsite. Has MERCER acted lawfully? Has 222 acted lawfully? Discuss.
QUESTION
3 (20 points): While negotiating with AGC for a new contract, Iron Workers Local
333 states that it will not sign any agreement unless AGC agrees that its
signatory members post payment bonds on all projects. Such bonds would assure
the payment of wages and fringe benefits to 333 members employed on AGC member
projects. AGC refuses to agree to the provision. 333 then ceases bargaining. Has
AGC acted lawfully? Has 333 acted lawfully? Discuss.
QUESTION
4 (20 points): For many years, Plumbers Local 444 has had labor agreements with
MCA. Prior to this year's negotiations for a new contract, ten members of MCA
withdraw from multiemployer bargaining. 444 then rejects these employers'
requests to bargain with them individually on the ground that the only unit in
which 444 members wish to bargain is the MCA multiemployer unit. 444 sends
letters to the ten employers, telling them that they will be struck unless they
sign a form agreeing to be bound by any agreement reached between MCA and 444.
Has MCA acted lawfully? Has 444 acted lawfully? Discuss.
QUESTION
5 (25 points): On consecutive days, POWER Construction is approached by
Electrical Workers Local 555 and Utility Workers Local 666. 555 and 666 each
claim to represent a majority of POWER's employees at its various project sites
in the area. The next week, when 555 convinces POWER of its majority status by
signed authorization cards, POWER negotiates a prehire agreement with 555 that
contains a typical union security clause. 666 then files a petition for a
representation election. Does the prehire agreement bar an election? Has POWER
done enough to resolve the matter? Discuss.
B CON 390U
Third Exam Winter 1987
QUESTION
1 (10 points): What obligations does a federal contractor have to the Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs with respect to its equal opportunity
policies? Whose interests are looked out for by OFCCP? Discuss.
QUESTION
2 (20 points): The owner of a unionized lathing and plastering contracting firm
which did a small amount of drywall installation discontinued her drywall
operations and set up a non-union firm, under her daughter's management, to do
drywall business on a much larger scale. What union tactics would be used to
combat the owner's action? Discuss.
QUESTION
3 (20 points): Why is a contractor compelled to pay its hourly workers a minimum
wage on private and federal work? What are some recent rule changes that affect
these matters? What are some further proposed changes to resolve still-perceived
problems? Discuss.
QUESTION
4 (25 points): Several Hispanic women unsuccessfully apply for bookkeeping jobs
with a contractor on a large project in the Southwest. When the positions remain
open, what can the women do to challenge the contractor? Can the contractor
defend its actions on the basis of the women's spoken accents? Discuss.
QUESTION
5 (25 points): What legal/social/political/ economic changes will impact the
construction labor environment over the upcoming few years? Discuss.
EVALUATION
Scores are earned on the three exams (weighted 25%, 35%, and 30%) and the report (10%). Thanks to John Feldhusen in Education at Purdue, grades are based on total weighted T scores-calculated separately for each exam question. My Mac again does the tough job by computing all scores using a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.
CONCLUSION
A
course in construction labor relations is an integral part of an undergraduate
construction program. The subjects covered can be quite provocative, and the
students emerge from the course better prepared to contribute as citizens to the
public debate.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
At
Purdue for an interview in June 1980, Dorsey Moss asked me about teaching the
construction labor relations course formerly taught by Jim Snyder. After
recovering my composure, I agreed; I guess he figured that any
attorney should be capable enough. The course described above is based upon
my collaboration with three former Purdue colleagues--Tom Hood, Lloyd Jones, and
Ron Mincy--during the 1980-82 school years. My thanks to all five for
introducing me to a fascinating slice of our industry.