(pressing HOME will start a new search)

 

Back Home

ASC Proceedings of the 28th Annual Conference
Auburn University - Auburn, Alabama
April 9 - 11,  1992              pp 59 - 64

SURVEY OF THE PHYSICAL FACILITIES FOR AN ACCREDITED ACCE CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION PROGRAM

H. Stephan Egger, Shahram Varzavand and Musibau Shofoluwe
University of Northern Iowa
Cedar Falls, Iowa

 

The American Council for Construction Education (ACCE) identifies the criteria for accreditation for construction programs an disrecognized by the Council on Postsecondary Accreditation (COPA) and the U. S. Department of Educa­tion. With the guidance, support, and recommendations of constructors from the education and industry community, "Standards and Criteria" have been established to insure quality of baccalaureate programs. An identified compo­nent for accreditation of an academic program is the physical facilities as defined in the ACCE annual report (1990). To help identify parameters of an acceptable facility, the accredited ACCE programs were surveyed. Seventeen of the twenty‑six administrators responded. The survey instrument was designed specifically using the Construction Science and Construction curriculum catego­ries and their subtitles per baccalaureate degree listings. Specific attention was directed toward allocated square footage, types of activities, type of equipment, and usage of an area.

 

INTRODUCTION

An important consideration for the faculty and students of a construction program is the physical facility and related equipment. This requirement is a special concern for programs dealing with accreditation body such as the American Council for Construction Education. The 1990 annual report of ACCE calls out the following criteria for physical facilities.

Physical facilities should be well maintained and organized to accommodate academic activities such as lectures, discussions, seminars, conferences, laboratory work, and research. The nature of construction programs imposes a need for special types of space and equipment to introduce the student to realistic construction methods and procedures. It is important that the facilities be arranged to encourage student and faculty interaction.

Traditional laboratory courses such as drafting surveying, and material testing may use facilities developed for the design disciplines. However, it is important that there also be laboratory facilities for the teaching of construction principles and practices. There should be facilities for office‑oriented activities with adequate storage space for multiple copies of plans and specifications, and facilities for field‑oriented activities such as space for model building and simulations.

The guidelines do not definitively specify physical constraints on a program. However, the types of activities occurring in a program's facility should relate to the construction curriculum.

The specific categories in the construction curriculum for an ACCE accredited program include Construction Sciences and Construction. Subtitles under each of these categories include the following.

Construction Sciences

bullet

Materials

bullet

Fundamentals of Construction Science

bullet

Analysis and Design of Building Systems

bullet

Construction Design

bullet

Other

Construction

bullet

Construction Fundamentals

bullet

Estimating and Bidding

bullet

Project Execution

bullet

Project Control

bullet

History of Construction

bullet

Applications of Business

bullet

Fundamentals; such as construction law,

bullet

construction accounting, etc.

bullet

Other Construction

The faculty at the University of Northern Iowa were interested in identifying a space allocation for the construction management program in the Department of Industrial Technology. The CM program was not in existence when the building was designed. Additionally, faculty in other curriculum areas within the department were hesitant about giving up some of their space. This gave us the motivation to complete a facility study of ACCE accredited programs. It was thought that such findings would assist us in justifying needed space.

After two mail outs, the following schools responded to the facility survey as displayed in Table

Table 1
Accredited Schools Responding to Facility Survey
Arizona State University
Auburn University
Boise State University
Brigham Young University
California Polytechnic State University
California State University, Chico
California State University, Sacramento
Clemson University
Colorado State University
Kansas State University
Kean College of New Jersey
Oregon State University
Texas A & M University
University of Cincinnati
University of Florida
University of Nebraska
University of Oklahoma
University of Washington
University of Wisconsin‑Madison

The program titles for line respondents included the follow­ing descriptors (table 2).

Table 2

Program Title

Program Title

No.

 

Building Construction

2

 

Building Science

1

 

Construction Administration

1

 

Construction Management

6

 

Construction

1

 

Construction Science

3

 

Construction Science & Management

2

 

Construction Engineering Management

1

 

Mechanical Contracting

1

 

TOTAL

18

 

The maintenance of the construction facility question (Table 3) indicated that support staff were available to construction programs.

Table 3
Facility Maintenance
Support Staff                     11
Faculty Release                  1
Other                                  3
Didn't Respond                  3

The following tables, Tables 4, S, and 6, display responses from the subtitle per the category Construction Sciences. Please note that each table additionally identifies a school, allocates square footage, usage, type of activity, and the type of equipment located in the space.

Tables 7, 8, 9, and 10 display the curriculum areas under the category of Construction.

Table 4
Materials ‑ Construction materials, components, and materials testing

 

 
School
Allocated Square Footage
Is This Space Used Solely For This Tonic
Type of Activities Occurring in This bag
Type of Equipment Located in the Footage
 
1
Lecture: Varies
Lab: 9,188
Lab -Yes
Material Testing
Material Testing
 
2
800
No
Material Testing
Versa Tester
Concrete Tester
Humidity Room
 
3
1,887
Yes
-
-
 
4
3,600
Yes
Concrete Mixing
Asphalt Mixing
Structural Testing
Testing Equipment
Asphalt & Concrete
Mixing Machines
 
5
400
No
Properties Testing
Optical Compantor
Ultrasonic Comprarsitor
Magnetic Compantor
Multi Tester
Tensile Tester
X-Ray
 
6
3,300
No
Lecture
No Testing Equipment
 
7
150 Seat Auditorium
No
Lecture
-
 
8
850
Yes
Soil & Concrete
Testing
Soil & Concrete
Preparation
Control Room
Misc. Testing Equip.
 
9
306
Yes
Material Testing
Universal Equipment
 
10
None
 
 
 
 
11
19,000
 
Materials & Soil
Testing
All common & typical
concrete & ferrous
metals testing equip.
 
12
1,650Lecture
1,800 Lab
No
Lecture
No Testing Equipment
 
13
400 Lab
No
Lecture
No Testing Equipment
 
14
1,500
No
Framing
Masonry
No Testing Equipment
 
15
3,200
No
Soils Lab
Soils & Concrete
Equipment
 
16
3,000 Planned
Yes
Soil & Concrete Testing
Soil & Concrete
Preparation
Control Room
 
17
4,000
Yes
Misc. Testing Equip.
Concrete Form Work
Rough Framing
Carpentry Equipment
Concrete
Efco Forms
 
         

Table 5

Fundamentals of Construction Science ‑ Statistics, strength of materials, dynamics, thermodynamics, soil mechanics, hydraulics

School

Allocated Square Footage

Is This Space Used Solely' For This Topic

Type of Activities Occurring in This Space

Type of Equipment Located in the Space

1

Lecture: Varies

Lab:1,160

Lab: Yes

Lecture

Material Testing

Material Testing

Equipment

2

500

Yes

Soil Testing

Fluid Mechanics

Testing

Versa Tester

Material Testing

Equipment

3

Soils:1,761

Other:1,291

Yes

Soil Testing

Flow Testing

Standard Equipment

4

4,800

No

Lecture & Lab

Demonstrations

Hydraulic Flume

5

400

Yes

Lecture & Lab

Related to

Strength of

Materials

Optical Comparitor

Ultrasonic Comparitor

Magnetic Compantor

Multi Tester

Tensile Tester

X-Ray

6

570

No

Lecture

No Testing Equipment

7

400 to

1,740

No

Lecture

No Testing Equipment

8

850

No

Soil & Concrete

Testing

Fire Testing &

Research

Material Testing

Equipment

9

2,383

No

Lecture

No Testing Equipment

10

4,000

No

Lecture

Typical Equipment

11

None

 

 

 

12

1,650

No

Classroom

No Testing Equipment

13

1,200

No

Lecture

No Testing Equipment

14

-

 

 

Typical Materials Lab

15

1,230

No

Lecture

N/A

16

960

No

Classroom

Instruction

No Testing Equipment

17

None

 

 

 

 

Table 6

Construction Design ‑ Temporary facilities, rigging formwork, scaffolding, foundations; construction surveying; construction graphics

School

Allocated Square Footage

Is This Space Used Solely' For Topic

Type of Activities Occurring m This Space

Type of Equipment Located m the

1

1,520

No

Lecture

None

2

800

No

Lecture

Versa Tester

Concrete Tester

Humidity Room

3

None

 

 

 

4

3,600

No

Lecture & Lab

Survey Equipment

5

None

 

 

 

6

570

No

Lecture

Surveying Equipment

7

Varies

No

Lecture & Lab

Surveying Equipment

Drafting Equipment

8

361

Yes

Lecture & Lab

Surveying Equipment

Laser Level

EDM Device

9

976

No

Lecture

No Testing Equipment

10

None

 

 

 

11

1400

700

-

Lecture & Lab

Computers (PC's)

12

1,650

3,600

No

Lecture & Lab

Mixer, Sand, Gravel,

Etc.

13

1,200

No

Studio & Lab

Drawing Tables

Computers

14

None

 

 

 

15

1,230

1,600

No

Lecture & Lab

Drafting Tables

16

960

No

Lecture

None

17

400

Yes

Lab

Surveying Equipment

 

Table 7

Proiect Control ‑ Scheduling, project budgeting, purchas­ing, expediting, cost control, cash flow

 

 

School

Allocated Square Footage

Is This Space Used Solely

or i o

Type of Activities Occurring is This Space

Type of Equipment Located m the Space

 

1

1,520

No

Lecture & Computer 16 IBM PCs

Applications 4 Printers

 

2

None

 

 

 

 

3

None

 

 

 

 

4

2,400

No

Lectures & Demos

None

 

5

560

Yes

Lecture

None

 

6

570

No

Lecture

None

 

7

900

No

Lecture

None

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

9

2,208

No

Lecture

Project Work

Computer Work

Drafting Tables

Computers

 

10

1,200

No

 

 

 

11

1,400

100

 

Lecture & Lab

Computers

 

12

1,650

1,500

No

Lecture & Lab

Computers

 

13

2400

No

Lecture & Lab

Computer Lab

Drawing Tables

 

14

900

No

Takeoffs

Tables

 

15

900

1,484

No

Lecture & Lab

computers

 

16

960

No

Lecture

None

 

17

None

 

 

 

In regard to table seven one of the respondents reported a lab space solely designated for project control. However 14 of the respondents indicated that the project control was part of multi‑use facility.

Table 8

Estimating and Bidding ‑ Quantity surveying, pricing, manpower estimates, bid compilation, bidding strategy

school

Allocated Square Footage

Is This Space Used Solely For This Topic

Type of Activities Occurring in This Space

Type of Equipment Located in the Space

1

1,520

No

Lecture & Computer Applications

16 IBM PCs

4 Printers

2

None

 

 

 

3

900

Yes

 

Computers

Drawing Boards

4

3,600

No

Lecture & Labs

 

5

1,128

480

No

Traditional &

Computerized

Estimating

Computers

6

1,800

Yes

 

Drafting Tables

7

900

No

Lectures & Computer Applications

Computers

8

 

 

 

 

9

2,208

No

Lecture

Project Work

Computer Work

Drafting Tables

Computers

10

1,500

No

 

 

11

1400

700

 

Lecture & Lab

Computers

12

1,650

1,500

No

Lecture

Computer Lab

Computers

13

1,200

No

Lecture & Lab

Drawing Tables

Computers

14

900

No

Take offs

Tables

15

900

1,428

No

Lecture & Lab

Computers

16

960

No

Lecture

None

17

2,400

No

 

Drafting Tables

In the area of estimating and bidding two of the respondents indicated an area solely for this activity. The remaining 15 respondence indicated that this area was part of multi‑use facility. In most cases this room was used for lecture and computer activities.

Table 9

Storage Space

School

Allocated Square pot e

Is This Space Used Solely This Topic

Type of Activities Occurring m This  Space

Type of Equipment Located in the Space

1

-

Yes

Storage Resource Room

Copier

Thermofax

2

200

Yes

Storage

 

3

600

Yes

Storage

Hard Hats

Survey Equipment

4

200

Yes

Storage

Computer Components

Misc. Equipment

5

120

-

Storage

Blueprints

AV Equipment

Specifications

6

300

Yes

Storage

 

7

100

Yes

Storage

 

8

278

Yes

Storage

AV Equipment

9

None

 

 

 

10

300

Yes

Storage

Models

Tools

11

360

 

Storage

Equip. & Material

12

500

Yes

Storage

Misc.

13

200

Yes

 

 

14

None

 

 

 

15

150

Yes

 

 

16

300

Yes

 

 

17

400

Yes

None

Mock-Up Materials

 

An area designated for storage space was indicated by almost all of the respondents. The average square footage was 286 square feet.

 

Table 10

Construction Fundamentals ‑ Orientation, drawings and specifications, contract documents, computer applications in construction

 

school

Allocated Square Footage

Is This Space Used Solely For This Topic

Type of Activities Occurring m This Space

Type of Equipment Located in the Space

 

1

1,520

No

Lecture

None

 

2

1,1000

No

Drafting

Drawing Tables

 

3

None

 

 

 

 

4

3,600

No

Lectures & Demos

Computers

Drawing Tables

 

5

1,128

 

Blueprint Reading

Estimating Equip. & HVAC Design

Drafting Equipment

 

6

1,800

1,200

No

No

 

Drafting Tables

Computers

 

7

1,203

No

Computer Lab

18 AT Type Compilers

Techsonic Digitizer

 

8

 

 

 

 

 

9

2,202

No

Lecture Project Work Computer Work

Drafting Tables Computer Work Stations

 

10

9,000

No

 

Standard Equip.

 

11

1,400

700

 

Lecture & Lab

Computers

 

12

1,500

No

Computer Assign.

Computers

 

13

1,200

No

Lecture & Lab

Drawing Tables Computers

 

14

900

No

Drafting

Drafting Tables

 

15

1,232

No

Lecture & Lab

 

 

16

960

No

Lecture

None

 

17

2400

Yes

 

 

         

For the area of construction fundamentals 13 of the 14 respondents indicated that no specific area was designated for this activity. From the type of activities and equipment listed it is evident that this activity is occurring in a multi use area.

 

CONCLUSION

The findings of study indicated that there is a variety of space allocations for lab and lecture activities among the program surveyed by this study among ACCE accredited programs. It is realized that there is a possibility that multitude of activity may occur in any one area. It is evident that there is flexibility in regard to facility expectations as long as the activities occurring within the program meet ACCE guidelines.