(pressing HOME will start a new search)

 

Back Next

ASC Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference
California Polytechnic State University - San Luis Obispo, California
April  1988              pp  83-87

 

FACULTY INDUSTRY INTERNSHIP AS AN IMPORTANT PRIORITY IN CONSTRUCTION EDUCATION

 

Zarjan Baha and  Patrick L. Glon
 Purdue University
West Lafayette, Indiana

 

A well-qualified faculty is one of the most important elements in a good construction program. This presentation will discuss one method of improving the skills of faculty members.

 Typically, construction faculty members come from graduate programs or from industry. Those coming from graduate programs need substantial exposure to the construction process. Faculty coming directly from industry need to be kept up-to-date on new technology and methods used in the construction industry. Faculty Industry Internship can play an important role in meeting the needs of both types of faculty. As a result, both education and industry benefit.

For developing an effective Faculty Industry Internship program, the educational institutions and the construction industry must maintain a close-working relationship. A concerted effort is required by both parties to establish a permanent and effective liaison. A Construction Advisory Council is a form of such a liaison that is recommended in this presentation.

 This presentation, while stressing the importance of this council, offers recommendations for the faculty member to be the active participant in establishing an effective working relationship with industry.

Key Words: Faculty, Industry, Internship, Advisory Council, Research, Construction, Experience

 

 

Introduction

 

The Professional Development Committee of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) has recognized the importance of Faculty Industry Internship (FII), and the following resolution was issued on April 7, 1987:

 

Professional development of construction education programs requires faculty that have current and on-going knowledge of industry problems, methods, innovations and needs. The best way for faculty to obtain and communicate this knowledge to construction management students is to actively participate in "real world" projects.

 

Therefore, this association requests that the appropriate university administration, college administration, department administration and review committee recognize the significant value of professional participation in a construction environment.

 

The periodic and continued involvement should be considered as an important activity, related to initial hiring, annual evaluation, tenure, and promotion of faculty. Appropriate relations with the construction industry may include, but are not limited to, internship, consulting, sabbatical appointment, summer appointment or leave appointment. Payment or non-payment for this activity should not be a criteria for recognizing credit for professional development.

 

However, the above resolution does not stress or advise the techniques to be employed to achieve its objectives.

 

The survey completed by the authors during the month of January, 1988, of member schools of the ASC, confirmed once again the importance of the professional development of faculty members in construction education, (Appendix A).

 

The bill to ban Japanese contractors from the United States public works by Congress (Engineering News Record, December 10, 1987) might look good in the short run. This tells us that the construction industry must be collectively concerned for its future to survive and realize the seriousness of competition of the international market.

 

Establishment of a close cooperation between the construction education institutions and industry seems to be one step in the right direction. In this presentation emphasis is placed on Faculty Industry Internship as an important issue in this cooperation.

 

 

Construction Faculty

 

A well-qualified faculty is the most important element in the enhancement of construction education. There is a definite shortage of faculty members nationwide. One of the reasons for this shortage could be that construction faculty are expected to have both higher education

credentials as well as practical experience. It is questionable if the education institutions could afford the incentives to attract a successful constructor who could, at the same time, be a good educator.

 

Constructors from industry with an M.S. or M.A. degree have made good educators in the past. Recent trends show that the construction education departments are expecting faculty members to do research and publish papers similar to faculty members of other disciplines within the university system. Thus, a Ph.D. degree holder might compete with an individual who has substantial field experience.

 

Another option for the education institution is to hire a fresh graduate with a Ph.D. degree but little or no field experience. Such an individual could be tempted to conduct more theoretical research, due to his/her background and the academic reality, where such work could be easily documented when it comes to promotion or tenureship. Such educators may not emphasize on the more traditionally and practically oriented aspects of the construction program.

 

The objectives of the construction education programs have been to prepare job-ready graduates for the industry. This mission can only be accomplished if the faculty member is a competent constructor. If research and publication are stressed too much, there is no doubt that the practical aspect of education could be easily overlooked. It is important that the education institutions, as well as industry, not let the present construction education programs change their mission under the pressure of a typical academic environment.

 

 

Construction Experience

 

Methods and materials in construction industry are changing very rapidly. The educators are expected to be aware of these changes and must be ready to adopt them in their teaching. Those faculty members that come from industry would need up-dating regarding methods and materials. For those faculty members who graduate from college without any field experience, it seems important to yet some construction experience. One method of getting industrial experience is to develop a strong and committed Faculty Industry Internship program. Faculty Industry Internship could have many forms. A typical internship is defined here, where a faculty member works on a temporary basis with industry related to his/her field of expertise. This definition was accepted by the majority of respondents (Appendix A).

 

 

Construction Advisory Council

 

The education institution and industry in construction must be the closest allies. There is no conflict of interest, and both are working for the same ultimate objectives of improving construction industry. Yet in many cases these two most natural allies are so far apart.

 

The long battle, that industry wants job-ready graduates while education institutions emphasize broad-base long term education goals, is already resolved because the construction education program objectives meet those of the industry in producing job-ready graduates.

 

For achieving the objectives of the construction profession, the education institution and industry must act as partners and establish a permanent liaison to work on a range of short-term as well as long-term goals.

 

There are many formats the academic institution and industry could follow to form a liaison. One form of liaison is an Advisory Council, where professionals from industry are requested by the educational institutions to serve on the advisory board. The objectives to be established, number of members, and its composition, frequency of meetings, and its effectiveness varies with the number of such councils throughout the system. One recommendation for creating such a council is to have inputs from both sides in the formation and establishment of the intended objectives. The objectives have to be based on equal partnership and both sides must receive the benefits as well as share the responsibilities.

 

The advisory council is expected to establish the spirit of cooperation between the education institutions and the construction industry. Among other tasks in which the council could be instrumental, is forming a quality Faculty Industry Internship program. Close cooperation between the two sides would establish better communication, and could improve the general attitude and develop into a real partnership.

 

Faculty Industry Internship includes working on joint research projects with industry. It would be possible to establish joint research projects that could be carried on in one or both of the institutions. Such research endeavors, on the one hand, could be production-oriented, and on the other hand, could find their way to classrooms without much delay. Research projects of this type could be reviewed by both sides regarding their relevance to solving today's problems, and in anticipation of the future.

 

 

Construction Faculty Initiatives

 

The faculty member is expected to play the crucial role in establishing contacts and associations with the construction industry. In the survey conducted by the authors it was clearly concluded that the majority of contacts were initiated by the individual faculty member (Appendix A). A faculty member must realize that his/her mission must coincide with that of the institution in order to produce graduates that could be leaders in the industry. This would require that he/she remain current with developments in the industry of his/her field of interest. This could be accomplished through research as well as working very closely with the industry. As stated earlier, most construction education programs are similar in the objectives of producing graduates who are job-ready upon graduation. This makes the close association of the educator with industry an imperative. Those who would like to conduct research activities also have to work with industry for support and advice regarding the relevance of the project and its usefulness to the industry.

 

For a faculty member to establish contact with the industry, it is important that he/she examine two aspects. One aspect covers needs of the construction industry. This could be found through the literature available, in the local, as well as the nationwide, markets, regarding the demand for various skills. The second aspect is to make a critical review of what specialty he/she would like to develop, based on interest and background. Once this decision is made, then the faculty must work on those skills to become an expert in the field.

A faculty member must concentrate in a specific area of interest and develop a specialty so that he/she could:

 

- Further explore within the specific field, and

become an expert in the subject.

- Peform and publish research and become a leader

in the field.

- Be productive during the time spent with industry and remain in demand.

- Analyze the existing industrial setting and come up with innovations to improve the present situation.

- Remain as a consultant to the construction industry and as a result, remain current on new developments in the industry.

- Establish initial contacts with related industry through the advisory council, and build long-lasting professional relationships.

- Develop and offer short-term courses to the related industry.

 

 

Conclusions

 

The construction industry being the largest industry in the country is also the most diverse, most fragmented, and most challenging industry. This industry remains mainly in the hands of local and national contractors. No competition was expected until very recent times. It looks like this scene is changing and international competition is emerging very rapidly. It is time that the industry initiate a more aggressive approach to tackling the problems of today and those envisioned in the future. One step in the right direction is to establish a more permanent cooperation between the education institutions and industry through creation of an Advisory Council. Education institutions are responsible for producing future leaders, while the construction industry employs the graduates of these institutions; both have common objectives in promoting the construction industry. The first step in this cooperation would be to establish a Faculty Industry Internship program that will promote more practically-oriented and competent construction education. The faculty member is expected to initiate contacts with the related construction industry and establish a more permanent relationship.

 

 

References

 

Burns, Conrad T. and Crewe, Colin "International Cooperation Between Industry & Education," Engineering Education, January 1982.

Coberly, C. A., "Conflicts in University-Industry Interactions," Engineering Education, March 1985.

Coberly, Camden A., "Research and University-Industry Interaction," Engineering Education, March 1979.

Glon, Patrick L., & Baha, Zarjan. "How the Industry Can Help improve Construction Education, The Need for Faculty Internship Program, " Walker's Estimating & Construction Journal, Vol. 4, No. 4, Summer 1986.

Iverson, Scott C. and Jorgensen, Jens E. "Directions for University-Industry Cooperative Research and Training," Engineering Education, November 1987.

Millett, M. L., Jr., and Holloway, R. B., "Research In Industry and On Campus," Engineering Education, March 1980.

Rath, Gerald A., "The Industrial Advisory Committee: Organization & Goals," Engineering Education, May 1981.

Weese, John A., "How NSF Encourages Industry-University Partnerships," Engineering Education, April 1985.

 

 

 

APPENDIX A

 

SUMMARY OF A SURVEY ON FACULTY INDUSTRY INTERNSHIP PROGRAM

 

 

The results of the survey completed during the month of January, 1988, by the authors, regarding Faculty Industry Internship (FII), is presented in summary form. A copy of the questionnaire sent to the heads of departments of the Associated Schools of Construction (ASC) is included ,(Appendix B).

 

Results

 

There was a total of 41 respondents out of the 70 questionnaires sent. However, all responses were not complete, and therefore the sum of responses may not equal the total number for each question. The responses for each question are summarized as follows:

I.          Definition of FII:

A.        27 respondents approved the given definition for I'll.

B.         5 respondents had slight variation but not anything new or major to be mentioned here.

II.         Importance of FII was rated from 0 (no importance) to 5 (highest importance) as following:

A.        35 respondents with ranking for promotion and tenureship of 2.0 out of a possible 5.

B.         35 respondents with ranking for skills and effectiveness in teaching of 3.9 out of a possible 5.

C.        35 respondents with ranking for professional development of 4.4 out of a possible 5.

D.        6 respondents with not anything new worth mentioning here.

III.       Status of FII in the construction departments:

A.        40 respondents, where 15 said Yes for having a form of FII and 25 said NO.

1.         3 respondents, initiated by the

department.

2.         15 respondents, initiated be the

individual faculty.

3.         2 respondents, initiated by the

industry.

4.         1 respondent, initiated by

professional association.

5.         1 respondent, initiated by advisory

council.

B.         Duration of FII was averaged as following:

1.         17 respondents for summer time with

an average of 2.8 months.
2.         8 respondents for sabbatical time

with an average of 8.5 months.

3.         5 respondents for leave of absence

time with an average of 10.6 months. 4. 9 respondents for part time, with an

average of 25%. Consultant (9);

Sponsored research (6); Joint

research projects (4); Service on an

adhoc basis ((2). Some respondents

marked more than one option on this

section.

5.         0 respondent for others.

IV. Contacts and cooperation with industry:

A         41 respondents, where there were 35 yes responses and 6 no responses.

B.         In the functions of the advisory committee or council, there were 14 respondents in curriculum, 13 respondents in fund-raising, 8 respondents in students placement, and 4 respondents indicated advising in general.

V.        In the "any other comments" section, there were 8 respondents that were in favor of the Faculty Industry Internship program but nothing new that was worth mentioning here.

 

 

 

APPENDIX B

 

QUESTIONNAIRE FOR THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ASSOCIATED SCHOOLS OF CONSTRUCTION

 

I.          Definition of Faculty Industry Internship (FII)

( ) A. Faculty member working on temporary basis with industry related to his/her field of expertise

( ) B. Others    

II.         Importance of Faculty Industry Internship

( ) A. Obtaining promotion or tenureship

( ) B. Improving teaching skills and effectiveness

( ) C. Professional development of faculty

( ) D. Others    

 

III. Status of Faculty Industry Internship

A.        Do you have the FII program in any form? (Yes or No)

B.         If the answer in part A is Yes, mark any of the following that closely describes the form of FII in your institution

1. Initiated by the department

2. Initiated by the individual faculty 3. Initiated by the local, regional, or

national industry

() 4. Initiated by professional associations.

Name the association

() 5. Others

C.        Duration of Faculty Industry Internship

1. Summer. Number of months. 2. Sabbatical. Number of months. 3. Leave of absence. Number of months.

() 4. Part-time. -Percent of FTE

spent.

Constant

Sponsored research project.

Joint research project.

Service on an adhoc basis.

Others 

( ) 5. Others    

IV. Contacts and cooperation with industry

A. Is there any liaison or other form of permanent contact established with industry? (yes or no)

B.         If answer is yes, mark one of the following that closely describes the form of relations:

( ) 1. Advisory committee or council which helps in:

( ) 2. Others:

V.        Any comment that you feel is pertinent to the
subject of Faculty Industry Internship:

Note: Extra paper could be added with proper identification of the item that may need more space.