(pressing HOME will start a new search)
|
|
ASC RESEARCH COMMITTEE PRESENTATION-RESEARCH INVOLVEMENT
Colen Boutwell Jr. University of
Florida |
Troy
McQueen
Tuskegee
University |
Steve
Easley
Purdue
University |
Gary
Gehrig |
Greg
Howell |
Albert
Pedulla
Texas A&M
University |
The
research committee presentation at the 1989 annual meeting in Nebraska
focused on issues related to the topics of: grant proposal writing,
developing funding sources (private or governmental), the mechanics
involved in conducting a project, and report preparation and dissemination
of results. The
presentation consisted of a selected panel of faculty members from ASC
member schools who have completed or are currently conducting a research
project. Each member of the panel presented a short statement about
his/her research project, research interest and view concerning research
in construction. The panel
responded to a series of questions drawn from the topic areas listed
above. The panel members submitted written answers to a pre-selected
series of questions. An question-answer session followed with panel
members fielding inquiries from the floor. A period of
time at the conclusion of the presentation was devoted to the topic of
“Developing the communications path…” (between colleagues,
programs, research interest groups). KEY WORDS:
Construction Research,
Building research, Research funding, Dissemination of research results. |
The
general format of the research committee presentation at the national meeting
was as outlined below:
Introduction
- Colen J. Boutwell Jr. Format of presentation
Topic
Areas
Introduction of moderator
Moderator
- Troy McQueen
Position
statement (3 to 5 Minutes)
Speaker
#1 Steve Easley, Purdue
Speaker
#2 Gary Gerhig, Colorado State
Speaker
#3 Greg Howell, Univ. of New Mexico
Speaker
#4 Al Padula, Texas A & M
Question
and Answer session - Troy McQueen Questions from the floor - Troy Mc Queen
Communications and dissemination - Colen Boutwell
The
submissions for publication from each speaker prior to the meeting are reported
below.
SIEVE EASELY - PURDUE UNIVERSITY
An
energy efficient cost effective research project
The
Department of Building Construction and Contracting, at Purdue University,
engaged in a $330,000 research project to design, construct, and evaluate a
cost-effective, energy efficient home. The goal of this project was to design
and build a home that would be extremely energy-efficient, attractive, and
affordable. our objective was to analyze the best and most cost-effective ideas
from proven research, and merge those ideas into a practical and
marketable design, which builders would build, and consumers would buy.
We
developed cost-effective construction techniques using off-the-shelf technology
that contractors could adapt in the field to make major changes in their
construction schedules. The two-story home has many popular features, such as a
cathedral ceiling, walk-in closets, a fireplace, and an open-living concept.
After
the home was constructed, a family moved into it, and the home, performance was
then monitored for two years as part of our research. Temperature, humidity,
indoor air quality, solar insulation, and outside weather conditions were
monitored. The 2000-square-foot hone performed very well. The total heating and
cooling costs for one year was $250. This four-bedroom home is located in a
6,000 degree-day climate. The home cost about $6,000 more to build than a
conventional home. The home cost $93,000 to build, and sold for $122,500.
Four
shows were produced for public television to document the design and
construction of this home in order to transfer this technology to builders and
consumers. These programs have been broadcast by satellite throughout the U. S.
This project has also been the subject of 60 articles in newspapers and
magazines. To date, over 10,000 requests for information have been answered.
This response indicates that consumers are interested in housing research.
I
believe that if there is interest by faculty in construction research: we should
focus on developing and testing building systems using new materials and
techniques for the construction industry; we should research the application of
construction equipment, tools, and building methods in order to increase
productivity and reduce construction costs; and we should analyze the
cost-effectiveness of new and existing building techniques, and disseminate this
information, so that the construction industry can progress as a result of our
research.
GARY GEE RIG - COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY
Concepts
and Methods of Schedule Compression, sponsored by the Construction Industry
Institute
The
research project Produced a catalog of ideas and techniques management might
consider when addressing the subject of schedule compression. Schedule
compression refers to the shortening of the required time for accomplishing one
or more engineering, procurement or construction tasks to:
(1)
reduce the overall Project construction time,
(2)
accelerate Progress, or (3) recover lost time.
The
study used the Delphi research methodology including many interviews with
experienced engineering and construction Personnel.
The
project has contributed significantly to the visibility and awareness of our
program. I have Presented the findings in 15 cities across the country to
many different industry associations including owners, designers, constructors
and educators. As a spin off of the Project, I presently serve as a member of
the CII Cost and Schedule Task Force.
What
constitutes research in the construction industry is a difficult question to
answer. In general I feel that an effort that generates new knowledge, new
applications of existing knowledge. or raises the level of knowledge and
application in the industry constitutes research. In the academic arenas,
the definition depends on the attitude of the institution as to what is
appropriate research and scholarly activity. Our institution accepts funded
Projects for developing and delivering training Programs as applied research.
Other schools define research as Purely bench research leading to new
theoretical knowledge. ASC needs to be sensitive to the differing attitudes.
Questions:
1.
I believe a top priority agenda item for ASC is faculty Professional
development. Construction higher education is now experiencing a severe shortage
of qualified faculty and administrators. Since many institutions are requiring
faculty research, ASC must be Pro-active in Promoting Professional development.
Seminars in grant Proposal writing and other research subjects conducted at
regional and national meetings would help both the member schools and faculty.
In
order to develop a Positive attitude towards research in the industry, ASC must
demonstrate how research has contributed to the industry. We need a data base of
research findings generated by ASC research and then ASC must promote the
positive effects this research has had on construction cost effectiveness.
2.
ASC can assist member schools by providing information on funding sources and
through the identification of research topics. Since ASC has a limited budget, I
doubt that significant seed monies exist. However. ASC might be able to persuade
industry to provide the seed monies for appropriate projects.
I
do not believe that a research consortium is Practical within the Present
operational structure of ASC. Consortiums succeed because of dedicated very
active folks with common interests and goals. I would support individual schools
joining together to seek a Particular Project.
3.
The transition from a teaching-service environment to a
teaching-research-service environment is strenuous. The commitment to research
comes through the desire to make something better. Since the normal maturation
process requires the faculty member to continue to teach as well as build a
research foundation. it is advantageous to
start with small funded Projects. Obtaining funded research requires a sound
marketing approach with defined strategies such as seeking seed monies,
Publishing articles to build a reputation, and Providing a Professional service
and end product.
GREG HOWELL - UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO
Project
Organization, The Construction Industry Institute.
I
am conducting a research project funded by the Construction Industry Institute.
It is directed by the Project Organizations Task Force. Our job is to understand
how and why projects are organized as they are. The project has had a
significant impact on our visibility for several reasons:
1.
The money involved is significant. This has an impact within the University
administration.
2.
The steering committee for the project meets 3 time a year. I have been able to
get them to come to UNM for one of those meetings.
3.
The research itself involves interviewing senior executives of major
corporations. Within the University, it has led me to work with people in other
departments.
4.
Local groups - AGC, NECA - have asked me to report to their membership on the
CII and the research findings.
I
believe that research should be aimed at uncovering what works when. We have
serious language definition problems. Our research should include the following areas:
a.
Organizational areas - How do we manage administrative systems.
b.
The boundary between organizations and technical subjects - The implementation
of computers to support decisions in construction organizations.
c.
Innovation in work methods.
Questions:
1.
I think we should work on improving the quality of our research products. The
awareness of the importance of the subject
is growing in the industry. The ASC might provide the forum to get rooky researchers
together and help us teach each other.
2.
I do not think the ASC should directly sponsor research. I think the ASC should
organize a set of industry advisors and hammer out a research agenda that suits
us both.
3.
Research is one aspect of the University - Industry relationship. We will get
funding in so far as we are working on the problems that excite the industry.
Unfortunately, these may not be the deeper or most important issues.
We have to learn to listen to the industry and reframe questions so that they
interest the industry and leave roam for us to explore the edges. We must
play work up within the local community. University pressure is tough but it can
be dealt with in contractual terms.
AL PEDUILA - Texas A& M University
Research
proiect: School energy audit.
This
research involvement developed from a continuing education program that was
funded by a local utility company. In an effort to make construction
trades aware of impacts of their work as related to energy uses, the utility
company established training programs for carpenters, plumbers, and steam
fitters. these programs dealt with various energy considerations that
would contribute to achieving economies at the construction site.
As
a result of these programs, we were asked to establish an energy auditing
program for public schools that would assist them
in reducing the amount of energy used in school buildings. Specific schools
were identified to serve as model programs. and an energy auditing procedure was
prepared and documented in such a way to permit by other schools by in-house
personnel.
This
activity led to considerable visibility for the College and the Department of
construction Science since it demonstrated expertise in the area. The University
subsequently established a Center for Energy and Mineral Resources, part of
whose program is to deal with problems related to energy conservation in the
public sector. Those seeking advice related to achieving energy conservation can
contact the Center and obtain answers at no cost. A number of the faculty who
were involved in the original
research effort who maintain expertise
in appropriate areas. currently participate in the
pro@ram by responding to inquiries that are received by the Center.
The Center also prepares a monthly publication with widespread circulation that
offers advice on various subjects related to energy conservation.
These
various efforts have given the College, the Department of Construction Science,
and the University a level of exposure that has enhanced its reputation and
created a high level of visibility in the public and private sectors. These
involvements have also resulted in having students enter our program to pursue
an advanced degree with emphasis in an energy related area.
Research
in construction concerns investigations into the myriad areas related to activities associate with the
construction process. This may involve studies related to materials and
methods of construction, construction delivery processes, estimating,
scheduling. management of construction, or any peripheral area that impacts the
construction process.
Questions:
1.
ASC should be instrumental in establishing liaisons to permit cooperative,
interdisciplinarian research activities between various member schools.
2.
ASC should act as a clearing house for identifying research interests of various
faculty in order to foster the associations specified in (a).
3.
The construction industry is notorious for not supporting university research.
ASC should establish liaison with representatives of industry to apprise them of
potential benefits to be derived by the support of such research efforts. ASC
should also solicit their financial assistance in supporting some modest level
of investigative effort.
4.
The answer to all parts of this question is "yes". The obvious
questions that must be asked include:
a.
What advantage is presented by conducting research through ASC vs. working with
faculty within your own university?
b.
Where does the seed money come from?
c.
What funding sources could ASC identify beyond those identified by our own
university?
5.
This is a subject that can be discussed ad infinitum. Research involvement is
not an activity that is easily achieved. There are myriad approaches
including:
a.
Establish contacts with those from when funding is desired: find out what areas they are interested in funding; and
write a proposal addressing this area.
b.
Establish credibility in a specific area of research interest by publishing a
significant number of papers in that subject area, attending conferences and
soliciting invitations to make presentations in the subject area. After
establishing a "reputation" as an expert, develop a proposal and
solicit funding from appropriate sources.
c.
Contact those who have succeeded in obtaining funding in areas of your research
interests. Demonstrate evidence of your expertise and express interest in
participating in future efforts.
d.
Become allied with others having interests/ expertise in canton areas of
research. Work together to develop proposals and identity potential funding
agencies.